<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 629 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412284</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, estimating the disallowance for bogus purchases at 12% of the total amount. The Tribunal considered that the assessee&#039;s income from contract work was not in dispute, indicating materials were sourced elsewhere. Relying on precedent, only the profit element within the bogus purchases was deemed taxable, differing from the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2021 09:00:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 629 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412284</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, estimating the disallowance for bogus purchases at 12% of the total amount. The Tribunal considered that the assessee&#039;s income from contract work was not in dispute, indicating materials were sourced elsewhere. Relying on precedent, only the profit element within the bogus purchases was deemed taxable, differing from the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>