<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 628 - SESSIONS COURT FOR GREATER MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412283</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail was refused in a GST investigation involving alleged circular trading and fraudulent input tax credit claims under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The court noted that the applicant was linked to the main accused, had initially joined the inquiry, but later repeatedly failed to appear despite summons and did not comply with an interim direction. Because the investigation was still at a nascent stage and the applicant&#039;s presence was considered necessary to trace the role of all persons involved, the applicant&#039;s conduct weighed against pre-arrest protection. Bail was therefore declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 12:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 628 - SESSIONS COURT FOR GREATER MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412283</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail was refused in a GST investigation involving alleged circular trading and fraudulent input tax credit claims under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The court noted that the applicant was linked to the main accused, had initially joined the inquiry, but later repeatedly failed to appear despite summons and did not comply with an interim direction. Because the investigation was still at a nascent stage and the applicant&#039;s presence was considered necessary to trace the role of all persons involved, the applicant&#039;s conduct weighed against pre-arrest protection. Bail was therefore declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>