<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 622 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412277</link>
    <description>The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directed the AO to delete the penalty levied under section 272A(2)(k) for all the assessment years under consideration. The Tribunal emphasized that procedural lapses causing no revenue loss should not attract penalties and reasonable cause for delay should be considered under section 273B. As a result, the appeals were allowed, and the penalties were ordered to be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2021 10:48:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 622 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412277</link>
      <description>The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directed the AO to delete the penalty levied under section 272A(2)(k) for all the assessment years under consideration. The Tribunal emphasized that procedural lapses causing no revenue loss should not attract penalties and reasonable cause for delay should be considered under section 273B. As a result, the appeals were allowed, and the penalties were ordered to be deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>