<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 612 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412267</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the provisional attachment order under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, finding it ultra vires as no proceedings were pending against the petitioner at the time of the attachment. The Court directed the respondents to defreeze the petitioner&#039;s bank account, without awarding costs, while emphasizing that lawful actions could still be pursued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2021 08:49:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 612 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412267</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the provisional attachment order under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, finding it ultra vires as no proceedings were pending against the petitioner at the time of the attachment. The Court directed the respondents to defreeze the petitioner&#039;s bank account, without awarding costs, while emphasizing that lawful actions could still be pursued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>