<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 610 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412265</link>
    <description>The court quashed the order reopening the assessment, as it was deemed a change of opinion without new material evidence. The petitioner had fully disclosed all relevant facts, and the conditions for reopening beyond four years were not met. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding the reopening proceedings invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2022 17:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 610 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412265</link>
      <description>The court quashed the order reopening the assessment, as it was deemed a change of opinion without new material evidence. The petitioner had fully disclosed all relevant facts, and the conditions for reopening beyond four years were not met. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding the reopening proceedings invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>