https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412264 The High Court addressed a petition regarding the provisional release of a seized vehicle, where the petitioner sought directions for release after facing delays and lack of response from the competent authority. The court allowed the Additional Director General (Adjudication) to be impleaded as a respondent. The court directed the newly added respondent to consider and decide on the application for provisional release within four weeks, emphasizing compliance with the law. en-us Tue, 24 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Sep 2021 08:49:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412264 The High Court addressed a petition regarding the provisional release of a seized vehicle, where the petitioner sought directions for release after facing delays and lack of response from the competent authority. The court allowed the Additional Director General (Adjudication) to be impleaded as a respondent. The court directed the newly added respondent to consider and decide on the application for provisional release within four weeks, emphasizing compliance with the law. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 24 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412264