<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 592 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412247</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s delay condonation application due to lack of sufficient cause for the delay in filing the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory timelines and the need for appellants to support their claims with specific and credible evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2021 08:48:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 592 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412247</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s delay condonation application due to lack of sufficient cause for the delay in filing the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory timelines and the need for appellants to support their claims with specific and credible evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>