<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 576 - SESSIONS COURT AT GREATER MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412231</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail in a GST prosecution may be refused where the material collected in search and investigation indicates prima facie large-scale evasion through allegedly non-existent entities and bogus invoices. The court considered the seriousness of the allegations, the alleged wrongful input tax credit, statements recorded under GST summons, and the possibility of further investigation, and found that cooperation by the applicant did not outweigh the need for deeper inquiry. The request for anticipatory bail was rejected because the alleged offences were treated as cognizable and non-bailable and custodial interrogation was considered necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2021 08:47:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 576 - SESSIONS COURT AT GREATER MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412231</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail in a GST prosecution may be refused where the material collected in search and investigation indicates prima facie large-scale evasion through allegedly non-existent entities and bogus invoices. The court considered the seriousness of the allegations, the alleged wrongful input tax credit, statements recorded under GST summons, and the possibility of further investigation, and found that cooperation by the applicant did not outweigh the need for deeper inquiry. The request for anticipatory bail was rejected because the alleged offences were treated as cognizable and non-bailable and custodial interrogation was considered necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>