<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1269 - SESSIONS FOR GREATER MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297601</link>
    <description>Allegations of fraudulent availing and passing on of input tax credit under the GST regime were treated as a serious economic offence because the record indicated invoice transactions without corresponding movement of goods and consequential revenue loss. The applicant&#039;s repeated non-compliance with summons, failure to furnish documents, and conduct suggesting evasion of arrest were relied on to show lack of cooperation with the investigation. Applying the settled approach that deep-rooted economic offences and investigation prejudice warrant strict scrutiny, the court refused anticipatory bail and rejected the application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2021 08:47:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1269 - SESSIONS FOR GREATER MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297601</link>
      <description>Allegations of fraudulent availing and passing on of input tax credit under the GST regime were treated as a serious economic offence because the record indicated invoice transactions without corresponding movement of goods and consequential revenue loss. The applicant&#039;s repeated non-compliance with summons, failure to furnish documents, and conduct suggesting evasion of arrest were relied on to show lack of cooperation with the investigation. Applying the settled approach that deep-rooted economic offences and investigation prejudice warrant strict scrutiny, the court refused anticipatory bail and rejected the application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>