https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297615 Section 25(d) of the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003 requires the Director of Enforcement to hold office for not less than two years from the date of assuming office, and the non obstante clause gives that statutory tenure priority over inconsistent rules. A rule fixing superannuation under the Fundamental Rules cannot curtail the minimum tenure prescribed by Parliament. The Director's appointment therefore had to continue for the full two-year period, and premature curtailment on superannuation grounds was impermissible. en-us Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Sep 2021 08:47:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297615 Section 25(d) of the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003 requires the Director of Enforcement to hold office for not less than two years from the date of assuming office, and the non obstante clause gives that statutory tenure priority over inconsistent rules. A rule fixing superannuation under the Fundamental Rules cannot curtail the minimum tenure prescribed by Parliament. The Director's appointment therefore had to continue for the full two-year period, and premature curtailment on superannuation grounds was impermissible. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297615