<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (1) TMI 55 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26565</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the Tribunal to refer only one question regarding whether the Wealth-tax Officer should accept the value shown by the assessee in the returns if it is higher than the valuation arrived at under rule 1BB. The court held that other questions were either consequences of the main question or were not pressed by the assessee. One question was deemed self-evident and did not warrant a reference. The court disposed of the applications, instructing the Tribunal to refer only the specified question for decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 10:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (1) TMI 55 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26565</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the Tribunal to refer only one question regarding whether the Wealth-tax Officer should accept the value shown by the assessee in the returns if it is higher than the valuation arrived at under rule 1BB. The court held that other questions were either consequences of the main question or were not pressed by the assessee. One question was deemed self-evident and did not warrant a reference. The court disposed of the applications, instructing the Tribunal to refer only the specified question for decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>