<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 572 - CESTAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412227</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the delay condonation application in a case where the appellant filed an appeal 335 days late due to a clerk&#039;s failure to promptly deliver the order. Despite the substantial delay, the Tribunal considered the appellant&#039;s prompt action upon receiving the order, acknowledging the importance of due diligence in litigation. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant satisfactorily explained the delay, leading to the condonation of the delay and the direction to assign a regular number to the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2021 08:47:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 572 - CESTAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412227</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the delay condonation application in a case where the appellant filed an appeal 335 days late due to a clerk&#039;s failure to promptly deliver the order. Despite the substantial delay, the Tribunal considered the appellant&#039;s prompt action upon receiving the order, acknowledging the importance of due diligence in litigation. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant satisfactorily explained the delay, leading to the condonation of the delay and the direction to assign a regular number to the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>