https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297598 The arbitration clause covered disputes arising under the distributorship agreement, but it did not empower the arbitrator to create a substantive right to restoration of the distributorship. Even if termination was unlawful, the proper relief available in arbitration was damages on the analogy of a civil court, not reinstatement of the contractual relationship. Observations in earlier writ proceedings could not enlarge the arbitrator's jurisdiction beyond the contract and the reference. The arbitrator therefore had no jurisdiction to direct restoration of the distributorship; only damages, if otherwise warranted, could be awarded. en-us Thu, 17 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Sep 2021 14:24:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297598 The arbitration clause covered disputes arising under the distributorship agreement, but it did not empower the arbitrator to create a substantive right to restoration of the distributorship. Even if termination was unlawful, the proper relief available in arbitration was damages on the analogy of a civil court, not reinstatement of the contractual relationship. Observations in earlier writ proceedings could not enlarge the arbitrator's jurisdiction beyond the contract and the reference. The arbitrator therefore had no jurisdiction to direct restoration of the distributorship; only damages, if otherwise warranted, could be awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297598