<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 556 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412211</link>
    <description>The court held that the assessment completed under Section 143(3) read with Section 147 on 26.12.2008 was not a &quot;regular assessment&quot; as it was not the first assessment. Therefore, Section 234D did not apply, and no interest could be levied on the respondent-assessee. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and the substantial questions of law were answered against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2021 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 556 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412211</link>
      <description>The court held that the assessment completed under Section 143(3) read with Section 147 on 26.12.2008 was not a &quot;regular assessment&quot; as it was not the first assessment. Therefore, Section 234D did not apply, and no interest could be levied on the respondent-assessee. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and the substantial questions of law were answered against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>