https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412206 Bail was granted where the accused had remained in custody for about fourteen months, the charge sheet had already been filed, and continued detention was not shown to be necessary for investigation or trial. Although the allegations involved diversion of funds through transactions with family accounts, the Court found the material insufficient to justify indefinite custody, particularly since the role of higher officers in the complainant company had not been properly investigated and the offences were triable by a Magistrate. The bail application was therefore allowed subject to conditions. en-us Thu, 08 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Sep 2021 09:23:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412206 Bail was granted where the accused had remained in custody for about fourteen months, the charge sheet had already been filed, and continued detention was not shown to be necessary for investigation or trial. Although the allegations involved diversion of funds through transactions with family accounts, the Court found the material insufficient to justify indefinite custody, particularly since the role of higher officers in the complainant company had not been properly investigated and the offences were triable by a Magistrate. The bail application was therefore allowed subject to conditions. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 08 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412206