<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 525 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412180</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the deletion of additions made under section 68 for Assessment Years (AY) 2011-12 and 2012-13, as the assessee provided substantial evidence establishing the genuineness of share capital and premium transactions. The Assessing Officer&#039;s lack of concrete evidence to disprove the transactions led the Tribunal to uphold the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and delete the additions for both years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2021 22:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 525 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412180</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the deletion of additions made under section 68 for Assessment Years (AY) 2011-12 and 2012-13, as the assessee provided substantial evidence establishing the genuineness of share capital and premium transactions. The Assessing Officer&#039;s lack of concrete evidence to disprove the transactions led the Tribunal to uphold the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and delete the additions for both years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>