<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1535 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297594</link>
    <description>Criminal proceedings for forgery and cheating arising from a bank fraud cannot be quashed merely because the accused settled with the bank and repaid dues. Where the allegations disclose a planned economic offence involving forged documents, multiple credit transactions and public money, the societal impact remains relevant and the matter is not treated as a purely private dispute. The inherent power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure must be used sparingly, only to prevent manifest injustice or abuse of process, and not to terminate prosecution for serious financial fraud on the basis of compromise alone. The order quashing the proceedings was therefore unsustainable and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1535 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297594</link>
      <description>Criminal proceedings for forgery and cheating arising from a bank fraud cannot be quashed merely because the accused settled with the bank and repaid dues. Where the allegations disclose a planned economic offence involving forged documents, multiple credit transactions and public money, the societal impact remains relevant and the matter is not treated as a purely private dispute. The inherent power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure must be used sparingly, only to prevent manifest injustice or abuse of process, and not to terminate prosecution for serious financial fraud on the basis of compromise alone. The order quashing the proceedings was therefore unsustainable and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>