https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297588 Anticipatory bail in a suspected foreign exchange violation was refused because the Court accepted that custodial interrogation can be necessary for an effective economic offence investigation. The investigating agency had relied on search material, statements and coded financial records, and the Court held that further questioning in custody was needed to trace the full extent of the alleged offences. It also held that a willingness to cooperate while on bail does not substitute for interrogation in custody, where confrontation with documents and other material is more effective. en-us Wed, 29 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Sep 2021 11:45:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297588 Anticipatory bail in a suspected foreign exchange violation was refused because the Court accepted that custodial interrogation can be necessary for an effective economic offence investigation. The investigating agency had relied on search material, statements and coded financial records, and the Court held that further questioning in custody was needed to trace the full extent of the alleged offences. It also held that a willingness to cooperate while on bail does not substitute for interrogation in custody, where confrontation with documents and other material is more effective. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297588