<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 493 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412148</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the refund claim was not time-barred as the amount in question did not constitute excise duty. The decision was based on the interpretation of relevant legal provisions and case laws, ultimately allowing the appeal and providing relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2021 09:55:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 493 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412148</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the refund claim was not time-barred as the amount in question did not constitute excise duty. The decision was based on the interpretation of relevant legal provisions and case laws, ultimately allowing the appeal and providing relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>