<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 2047 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297583</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the award of the tender for Vehicle Tracking System and Passenger Information System to respondent no.2, finding that the negotiations and adjustments made post-GST implementation were within permissible limits. It concluded that the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation acted in accordance with tender conditions and the corrigendum, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s challenge as lacking merit. The petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2021 21:01:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 2047 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297583</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the award of the tender for Vehicle Tracking System and Passenger Information System to respondent no.2, finding that the negotiations and adjustments made post-GST implementation were within permissible limits. It concluded that the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation acted in accordance with tender conditions and the corrigendum, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s challenge as lacking merit. The petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>