<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1933 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297569</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all issues, including classifying the assessee society as charitable, allowing benefits under sections 11 &amp;amp; 12 despite alleged violations, and dismissing the disallowance of depreciation amounting to Rs. 5,38,64,605 on grounds of double benefit. The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, confirming the correctness of granting exemption under section 11.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2021 17:34:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1933 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297569</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all issues, including classifying the assessee society as charitable, allowing benefits under sections 11 &amp;amp; 12 despite alleged violations, and dismissing the disallowance of depreciation amounting to Rs. 5,38,64,605 on grounds of double benefit. The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, confirming the correctness of granting exemption under section 11.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>