<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1932 - ITAT BENGALURU</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297568</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with several issues remanded to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) for fresh examination. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of detailed analysis and consideration of functional profiles, financial data, and risk adjustments for a fair determination of the arm&#039;s length price.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2021 17:34:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1932 - ITAT BENGALURU</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297568</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with several issues remanded to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) for fresh examination. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of detailed analysis and consideration of functional profiles, financial data, and risk adjustments for a fair determination of the arm&#039;s length price.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>