https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297571 Successive bail applications under Section 439 were rejected where the applicants showed no real change in circumstances despite examination of three prosecution witnesses. The Court treated the allegations as grave, noted that the trial was at a crucial stage with most witnesses still to be examined, and found that these factors outweighed any reliance on partial evidence having been recorded. The apprehension that the accused could tamper with evidence or influence or threaten witnesses further supported refusal of bail. Bail was declined and the petitions were dismissed. en-us Mon, 19 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Sep 2021 17:34:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297571 Successive bail applications under Section 439 were rejected where the applicants showed no real change in circumstances despite examination of three prosecution witnesses. The Court treated the allegations as grave, noted that the trial was at a crucial stage with most witnesses still to be examined, and found that these factors outweighed any reliance on partial evidence having been recorded. The apprehension that the accused could tamper with evidence or influence or threaten witnesses further supported refusal of bail. Bail was declined and the petitions were dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 19 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297571