https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297560 Cancellation applications were maintainable under Section 482 and Article 227 because the accused had not yet availed of bail, so the usual cancellation provisions under Sections 437(5) and 439(2) were not effective. Bail granted on medical grounds under the proviso to Section 437(1) requires a judicial assessment of the nature and seriousness of the illness, the adequacy of treatment in custody, and the necessity of release. A bare assertion of treatment, without medical inquiry or supporting material, was treated as insufficient. The impugned bail order was therefore quashed as illegal, perverse and arbitrary. en-us Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Apr 2024 10:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297560 Cancellation applications were maintainable under Section 482 and Article 227 because the accused had not yet availed of bail, so the usual cancellation provisions under Sections 437(5) and 439(2) were not effective. Bail granted on medical grounds under the proviso to Section 437(1) requires a judicial assessment of the nature and seriousness of the illness, the adequacy of treatment in custody, and the necessity of release. A bare assertion of treatment, without medical inquiry or supporting material, was treated as insufficient. The impugned bail order was therefore quashed as illegal, perverse and arbitrary. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297560