<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 478 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412133</link>
    <description>Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure permits scrutiny of a bail order once passed, and that power is not dependent on the accused having actually been released from custody. The 2018 amendment to Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act did not revive the earlier twin conditions for bail in money-laundering offences. Interference with a bail order remains justified only where the Special Court relied on irrelevant material or ignored relevant considerations; mere complaint filing and investigation stage, without demonstrated prejudice to the prosecution case, were treated as insufficient to cancel bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2021 12:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 478 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412133</link>
      <description>Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure permits scrutiny of a bail order once passed, and that power is not dependent on the accused having actually been released from custody. The 2018 amendment to Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act did not revive the earlier twin conditions for bail in money-laundering offences. Interference with a bail order remains justified only where the Special Court relied on irrelevant material or ignored relevant considerations; mere complaint filing and investigation stage, without demonstrated prejudice to the prosecution case, were treated as insufficient to cancel bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>