<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 466 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412121</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi upheld the appellant&#039;s claim for depreciation on toll road assets, dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, and found no justification for penalty proceedings under section 271(l)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(A) allowed depreciation based on the concession agreement terms, ruled that Circular No. 09/2014 should be applied prospectively, and did not support the penalty initiation by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 17:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 466 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412121</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi upheld the appellant&#039;s claim for depreciation on toll road assets, dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, and found no justification for penalty proceedings under section 271(l)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(A) allowed depreciation based on the concession agreement terms, ruled that Circular No. 09/2014 should be applied prospectively, and did not support the penalty initiation by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>