<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 445 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412100</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the cash amount seized from the assessee belonged to Lux Industries Limited and not the assessee personally. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). As a result, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2021 15:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 445 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412100</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the cash amount seized from the assessee belonged to Lux Industries Limited and not the assessee personally. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). As a result, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>