https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412098 The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the National Company Law Tribunal to reject the appeal seeking restoration of a company's name that was struck off by the Registrar of Companies. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence supporting the appellant's claim of being a creditor and raised doubts about their credibility and intentions. Respondent No. 2 expressed readiness for compliance and revival, but the Tribunal concluded that the company had not been in operation since 2000, casting doubt on the appellant's claim. The appeal was dismissed without costs due to malafide intention in filing the appeal after the prescribed appeal period had lapsed. en-us Thu, 02 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Sep 2021 13:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412098 The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the National Company Law Tribunal to reject the appeal seeking restoration of a company's name that was struck off by the Registrar of Companies. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence supporting the appellant's claim of being a creditor and raised doubts about their credibility and intentions. Respondent No. 2 expressed readiness for compliance and revival, but the Tribunal concluded that the company had not been in operation since 2000, casting doubt on the appellant's claim. The appeal was dismissed without costs due to malafide intention in filing the appeal after the prescribed appeal period had lapsed. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 02 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412098