https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412093 The ITAT Jodhpur allowed the appeal, setting aside the order of the ld. Pr. CIT and upholding the decision of the Assessing Officer. The contribution to the PAC Development Fund was considered a valid business expenditure based on business expediency, supported by relevant court decisions and consistency in decision-making. en-us Tue, 31 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Sep 2021 10:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412093 The ITAT Jodhpur allowed the appeal, setting aside the order of the ld. Pr. CIT and upholding the decision of the Assessing Officer. The contribution to the PAC Development Fund was considered a valid business expenditure based on business expediency, supported by relevant court decisions and consistency in decision-making. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 31 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412093