<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 2203 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297548</link>
    <description>The court granted the petitioner&#039;s request for a copy of their sworn statement but dismissed the challenges to the order passed under section 24(4) of the Benami Property Transactions Act. The court emphasized the importance of raising contentions before the adjudicating authority and proceeded in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2021 02:19:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 2203 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297548</link>
      <description>The court granted the petitioner&#039;s request for a copy of their sworn statement but dismissed the challenges to the order passed under section 24(4) of the Benami Property Transactions Act. The court emphasized the importance of raising contentions before the adjudicating authority and proceeded in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>