<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1884 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297547</link>
    <description>Customer royalty programmes provided by the assessee were examined to determine whether they constituted fees for technical services or royalty under Article 12 of the India-United States DTAA. The Delhi HC treated the issue as covered by its earlier decision in the assessee&#039;s own case on the same question and followed that precedent. The issue was answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2021 02:19:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1884 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297547</link>
      <description>Customer royalty programmes provided by the assessee were examined to determine whether they constituted fees for technical services or royalty under Article 12 of the India-United States DTAA. The Delhi HC treated the issue as covered by its earlier decision in the assessee&#039;s own case on the same question and followed that precedent. The issue was answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>