https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297552 The High Court dismissed the writ petition concerning a property ownership dispute, emphasizing that the petitioner should seek relief through the civil court where a suit was pending. The court advised against invoking constitutional provisions for parallel directions, as it could disrupt the ongoing dispute resolution process. It was deemed inappropriate to issue directions through the writ petition, and the petitioner was directed to pursue necessary remedies through the civil court to protect his interests. The writ petition was found not maintainable, and no costs were awarded in its dismissal. en-us Tue, 09 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Sep 2021 11:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297552 The High Court dismissed the writ petition concerning a property ownership dispute, emphasizing that the petitioner should seek relief through the civil court where a suit was pending. The court advised against invoking constitutional provisions for parallel directions, as it could disrupt the ongoing dispute resolution process. It was deemed inappropriate to issue directions through the writ petition, and the petitioner was directed to pursue necessary remedies through the civil court to protect his interests. The writ petition was found not maintainable, and no costs were awarded in its dismissal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297552