<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (3) TMI 65 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26532</link>
    <description>A compulsory betterment contribution levied under a town planning scheme, imposed because development of the area had increased or was likely to increase the land&#039;s value, was treated as revenue expenditure where it did not bring any asset into existence or enlarge the assessee&#039;s profit-making apparatus. The levy merely funded facilities such as roads and drainage that facilitated the factory&#039;s business operations, so its character was connected with the use of those facilities rather than an enduring advantage in the capital field. The deduction was therefore admissible in computing business income and the issue was answered against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:07:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (3) TMI 65 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26532</link>
      <description>A compulsory betterment contribution levied under a town planning scheme, imposed because development of the area had increased or was likely to increase the land&#039;s value, was treated as revenue expenditure where it did not bring any asset into existence or enlarge the assessee&#039;s profit-making apparatus. The levy merely funded facilities such as roads and drainage that facilitated the factory&#039;s business operations, so its character was connected with the use of those facilities rather than an enduring advantage in the capital field. The deduction was therefore admissible in computing business income and the issue was answered against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>