<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 412 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412067</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order, allowing the MSME unit&#039;s Suspended Management to submit a Resolution Plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, considering the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic. Issues regarding the Financial Creditor&#039;s claim, One Time Settlement, and fraudulent transactions were raised. The Respondent challenged the Appellant&#039;s participation, citing non-compliance and lack of transparency. The Tribunal emphasized promoting entrepreneurship while ensuring compliance, citing legal judgments and upholding the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s discretion. The Tribunal advised addressing pending issues before approving any Resolution Plan.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 08:21:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 412 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412067</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order, allowing the MSME unit&#039;s Suspended Management to submit a Resolution Plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, considering the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic. Issues regarding the Financial Creditor&#039;s claim, One Time Settlement, and fraudulent transactions were raised. The Respondent challenged the Appellant&#039;s participation, citing non-compliance and lack of transparency. The Tribunal emphasized promoting entrepreneurship while ensuring compliance, citing legal judgments and upholding the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s discretion. The Tribunal advised addressing pending issues before approving any Resolution Plan.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>