<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 404 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412059</link>
    <description>The ITAT Jodhpur ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue&#039;s interest. The tribunal found that the case was selected for limited scrutiny and the order was correct on the issues for which the case was chosen. The revision order was quashed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed based on the considerations of the tribunal regarding real estate dealer issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 08:19:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 404 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412059</link>
      <description>The ITAT Jodhpur ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue&#039;s interest. The tribunal found that the case was selected for limited scrutiny and the order was correct on the issues for which the case was chosen. The revision order was quashed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed based on the considerations of the tribunal regarding real estate dealer issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>