<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 394 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412049</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the order passed by the Pr. CIT, stating that the AO had duly considered the issue and took a possible view, which is not unsustainable in law. The Tribunal held that the assessment order could not be revised under Section 263, as the conditions for such revision were not fulfilled. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 08:18:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 394 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412049</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the order passed by the Pr. CIT, stating that the AO had duly considered the issue and took a possible view, which is not unsustainable in law. The Tribunal held that the assessment order could not be revised under Section 263, as the conditions for such revision were not fulfilled. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>