<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 392 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412047</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the penalties levied under Section 271(1)(c) for both the disallowance of ROC fees and interest expenditure. The Tribunal emphasized that the issues were debatable and the claims were made in good faith.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 08:18:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 392 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412047</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the penalties levied under Section 271(1)(c) for both the disallowance of ROC fees and interest expenditure. The Tribunal emphasized that the issues were debatable and the claims were made in good faith.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>