https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412040 The tribunal dismissed the appeal against the Registrar of Companies' decision to strike off a company's name under Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013. The company failed to file annual returns and financial statements, leading to the striking off. Despite the appellant's arguments and submission of financial documents, the tribunal emphasized the importance of active business operations for restoration. The tribunal declined to interfere with the decision, highlighting the significance of compliance and legitimate business activities in determining restoration of struck-off companies. en-us Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Sep 2021 08:18:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412040 The tribunal dismissed the appeal against the Registrar of Companies' decision to strike off a company's name under Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013. The company failed to file annual returns and financial statements, leading to the striking off. Despite the appellant's arguments and submission of financial documents, the tribunal emphasized the importance of active business operations for restoration. The tribunal declined to interfere with the decision, highlighting the significance of compliance and legitimate business activities in determining restoration of struck-off companies. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412040