<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1352 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297521</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, emphasizing the need for thorough examination of deductions claimed under section 54 of the Income Tax Act and assessment enhancement related to unexplained investments. The Tribunal remitted both issues back to the Assessing Officer for proper investigation, highlighting the importance of compliance with legal requirements in verifying the deductions and investments made by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2021 20:41:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1352 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297521</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, emphasizing the need for thorough examination of deductions claimed under section 54 of the Income Tax Act and assessment enhancement related to unexplained investments. The Tribunal remitted both issues back to the Assessing Officer for proper investigation, highlighting the importance of compliance with legal requirements in verifying the deductions and investments made by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>