<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty Upheld: Section 271(1)(c) Notice Valid Despite Non-Specified Charge; Assessee&#039;s Late Objection Overruled.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59591</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - non specification of charge - new plea before the authorities below - In this case in hand, there is no such plea raised by the assessee before the Assessing Officer at the initial stage. Hence, the notice issued under section 271(1)(c) of the Act is valid notice and therefore, the ground raised by the assessee is not acceptable. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2021 13:21:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2021 13:21:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty Upheld: Section 271(1)(c) Notice Valid Despite Non-Specified Charge; Assessee&#039;s Late Objection Overruled.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59591</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - non specification of charge - new plea before the authorities below - In this case in hand, there is no such plea raised by the assessee before the Assessing Officer at the initial stage. Hence, the notice issued under section 271(1)(c) of the Act is valid notice and therefore, the ground raised by the assessee is not acceptable. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2021 13:21:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>