<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 370 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412025</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petitions challenging the provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, finding it valid and supported by evidence of money laundering. Emphasizing the need to exhaust alternative remedies, the court condemned the suppression of material facts and fraudulent conduct, denying the petitioners relief under the writ jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2021 08:35:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 370 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412025</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petitions challenging the provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, finding it valid and supported by evidence of money laundering. Emphasizing the need to exhaust alternative remedies, the court condemned the suppression of material facts and fraudulent conduct, denying the petitioners relief under the writ jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>