https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412022 A writ petition seeking refund of GST and allocation of GST liability under a lease agreement was not entertainable because the agreement contained an arbitration clause covering all disputes arising out of or in connection with it. The HC declined to interpret the tax-payment clauses in writ jurisdiction, including the clause said to cover new tax introductions, and left those contractual questions to the agreed arbitral forum. The parties were therefore relegated to arbitration, and the petitioner did not succeed. en-us Mon, 02 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Mar 2025 12:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412022 A writ petition seeking refund of GST and allocation of GST liability under a lease agreement was not entertainable because the agreement contained an arbitration clause covering all disputes arising out of or in connection with it. The HC declined to interpret the tax-payment clauses in writ jurisdiction, including the clause said to cover new tax introductions, and left those contractual questions to the agreed arbitral forum. The parties were therefore relegated to arbitration, and the petitioner did not succeed. Case-Laws GST Mon, 02 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412022