<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 358 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412013</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, emphasizing the overriding effect of the SEZ Act and the procedural nature of obtaining UAC approvals. The decision reinforced that SEZ units are entitled to service tax exemptions for authorized operations, irrespective of procedural delays in obtaining approvals. The Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order denying refund claims based on the non-inclusion of ocean freight in the approved list was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 16:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 358 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412013</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, emphasizing the overriding effect of the SEZ Act and the procedural nature of obtaining UAC approvals. The decision reinforced that SEZ units are entitled to service tax exemptions for authorized operations, irrespective of procedural delays in obtaining approvals. The Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order denying refund claims based on the non-inclusion of ocean freight in the approved list was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>