<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 356 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412011</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, granting relief to the appellant on both issues by setting aside penalties under sections 76 and 78 and acknowledging the payment of duty without contest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2023 12:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 356 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412011</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, granting relief to the appellant on both issues by setting aside penalties under sections 76 and 78 and acknowledging the payment of duty without contest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412011</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>