<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 339 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411994</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the Assessing Officer exceeded jurisdiction by making substantive additions on a new issue in the reassessment proceedings. The addition of Rs. 12.41 crores in the assessee&#039;s hands was deemed unjustified as it was already included in another party&#039;s assessment, and the source of the deposits was satisfactorily explained. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the Rs. 12.41 crores addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2021 08:33:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 339 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411994</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the Assessing Officer exceeded jurisdiction by making substantive additions on a new issue in the reassessment proceedings. The addition of Rs. 12.41 crores in the assessee&#039;s hands was deemed unjustified as it was already included in another party&#039;s assessment, and the source of the deposits was satisfactorily explained. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the Rs. 12.41 crores addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>