<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 336 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , GUWAHATI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411991</link>
    <description>The Tribunal sanctioned the Composite Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 230-232 of the Companies Act, 2013, involving Broadcasting Business and Cable Distribution Business. The Scheme, approved by the Boards of both companies and stakeholders, aimed to unlock shareholder value and provide growth opportunities. All statutory compliances were met, and the Scheme was found beneficial without adverse effects on shareholders, employees, or creditors. Directions were given for asset transfers, legal proceedings, and employee continuity. The order did not exempt payment of Stamp Duty or taxes, and legal fees for the Regional Director were quantified and directed to be paid by the Resulting Company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2021 08:33:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 336 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , GUWAHATI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411991</link>
      <description>The Tribunal sanctioned the Composite Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 230-232 of the Companies Act, 2013, involving Broadcasting Business and Cable Distribution Business. The Scheme, approved by the Boards of both companies and stakeholders, aimed to unlock shareholder value and provide growth opportunities. All statutory compliances were met, and the Scheme was found beneficial without adverse effects on shareholders, employees, or creditors. Directions were given for asset transfers, legal proceedings, and employee continuity. The order did not exempt payment of Stamp Duty or taxes, and legal fees for the Regional Director were quantified and directed to be paid by the Resulting Company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>