<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 327 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411982</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, finding the disallowance of transport expenses to be adhoc and lacking evidence of concealment of income. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of establishing a direct link between inaccurate particulars and the penalty. Consequently, the penalty of &amp;amp;8377;5,73,064 was deleted, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2021 08:33:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=655111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 327 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411982</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, finding the disallowance of transport expenses to be adhoc and lacking evidence of concealment of income. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of establishing a direct link between inaccurate particulars and the penalty. Consequently, the penalty of &amp;amp;8377;5,73,064 was deleted, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>