<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (11) TMI 13 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26513</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, directing the Commissioner to reconsider the petitioner&#039;s application for waiver of penalty and interest for specific assessment years. The court held that even if the Commissioner lacked the power to review, relief under Article 226 of the Constitution was available. The Commissioner&#039;s previous orders were quashed, and reconsideration was mandated based on the Tribunal&#039;s order removing the stigma of income concealment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:05:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (11) TMI 13 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26513</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, directing the Commissioner to reconsider the petitioner&#039;s application for waiver of penalty and interest for specific assessment years. The court held that even if the Commissioner lacked the power to review, relief under Article 226 of the Constitution was available. The Commissioner&#039;s previous orders were quashed, and reconsideration was mandated based on the Tribunal&#039;s order removing the stigma of income concealment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>