<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (3) TMI 63 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26510</link>
    <description>The court held that payments made by the assessee company to a partnership firm, whose partners were also directors of the company, were considered payments to the directors themselves. As a result, section 40(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and its ceiling limits were applicable. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was overturned, and the Commissioner&#039;s order disallowing the amounts exceeding the prescribed limit was upheld. The outcome favored the Revenue against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:59:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (3) TMI 63 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26510</link>
      <description>The court held that payments made by the assessee company to a partnership firm, whose partners were also directors of the company, were considered payments to the directors themselves. As a result, section 40(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and its ceiling limits were applicable. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was overturned, and the Commissioner&#039;s order disallowing the amounts exceeding the prescribed limit was upheld. The outcome favored the Revenue against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>