https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297497 Registered title documents prevailed over the defendant's plea of benami ownership and an alleged oral family settlement. The Court held that the defence was inconsistent with the admitted registered gift deed and conveyance deed, unsupported by any written instrument, and barred by the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988; it therefore raised no real triable issue and amounted to a moonshine defence fit for judgment on admission. As the defendant had not pursued any independent proceeding to prove the alleged settlement, the plaintiff was entitled to relief under Order XII Rule 6 CPC. The suit was decreed for mandatory and permanent injunction, while monetary relief was refused. en-us Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Sep 2021 08:07:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297497 Registered title documents prevailed over the defendant's plea of benami ownership and an alleged oral family settlement. The Court held that the defence was inconsistent with the admitted registered gift deed and conveyance deed, unsupported by any written instrument, and barred by the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988; it therefore raised no real triable issue and amounted to a moonshine defence fit for judgment on admission. As the defendant had not pursued any independent proceeding to prove the alleged settlement, the plaintiff was entitled to relief under Order XII Rule 6 CPC. The suit was decreed for mandatory and permanent injunction, while monetary relief was refused. Case-Laws Benami Property Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297497